Mötet Speakers Corner  i CompuText


vrm1qdf0

Q¼'æ
&
XCompu-Text, inloggn. 870710, mötet Misslyckade Forskare

Du befinner dig i Speakers corner (engelska disk


Text 226   1987-06-22 Klockan 21:38
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 219 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Miljöpartiet/The green ones

And in case they do not agree with either block ? Then we've got a 
hung parliament! Sure, as a supporting party (or non-supporting) they've 
got a lot of power. The communist party has a great lot to say, even 
though they only control about 10% in comparison w/SAP. And so have 
the (sp) in the city hall, and they've only got 4 seats out of 101! 
They ousted the leader of the city government this winter past, remember 
?

(Slut på text 226 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 229 av Harald Fragner)

Läsa (inlägg) 227 - 

Text 227   1987-06-23 Klockan 00:03
Skrivet av: K. Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: 

I'm very glad that we're having a discussion that leads somewere and
maybe makes it easyer for someone to vote next year, we have the two 
points of wiew:
               Simon Tardell witch i think is the most sensible according
               to my point of wiew and:
               LES, Harald Fragner and Erik Lundevall who think that 
               MP is the right answer.
Let's show all those buggers that though we aren't experts in writing 
English, we atleast try and with some imagination understand and write
in a sensible way.
Let's also write som more!

(Slut på text 227 av K. Hansson-Renaud)
(Kommentar i text 230 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 231 av Erik Lundevall)
(Kommentar i text 239 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 228 - 

Text 228   1987-06-23 Klockan 03:37
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 225 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Progress?

What do you mean by 'End of infant mortality'?
You mean you want to die, but not while you're still young?

I don't think older persons agree! They want to live on too. The average 
lenth of a lifetime is increasing, quite rapidly. And if medicine 
is able to cure ALL of our diseases....

(Slut på text 228 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 240 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 229 - 

Text 229   1987-06-23 Klockan 03:42
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 226 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Miljöpartiet/The green ones

So what if they don't agree with either block?
The chance of both sides getting equaly strong isn't all too big, 
is it?

(Slut på text 229 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 241 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 230 - 

Text 230   1987-06-23 Klockan 03:45
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 227 av K. Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: 

I'm not very sure about MP being the right answer to any of my political 
questions (those that interest me).
In fact, I don't care very much about politics att all. It's just 
that I think MP are having some nice ideas, and that it migt be some 
kind of injection to Swedish politics if they made it in the election. 

I don't really care about who is going to lead Sweden on for the next 
three years. The opinions of S and M don't differ very much in my 
point of view. They have some differnt ideas about taxes and ownership 
of some plants and other stuff. So what?
They are both (hopefully) going to do their best to make Sweden a 
decent place to live in. And so are MP.

So i figured it might be nice getting some new ideas that i agree 
with into parliament.
Sweden is already quite mixed up between Socialistic and Capitalistic 
ideas. Why not mix it up some more?

I think the mix of Socialism and Capitalism is quite nice, as it has 
worked out to be in Sweden.

(Slut på text 230 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 242 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 231 - 

Text 231   1987-06-23 Klockan 10:33
Skrivet av: Erik Lundevall  #38
Kommentar till text 227 av K. Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: 

I can't say that I think MP is the right answer, because I don't, 
but neither do I think of any other party having the right answer 
for everything.
In some cases one party is good, in some questions there's one of 
the other etc., but no one is alone good enough to get a vote in my 
opinion. 
I voted in the last election, but that was more of a voting for the 
least bad party.
As I said before, with MP in the parliament there would be more done, 
not because of their politics, but because of their very existence.
As neither S or any of the non-socialistic partys like MP, they have 
to colabotate if they don't want MP to "toss the coin", deciding which 
side will win.
And colaboration between all parties is definitely better than the 
block-politics. 
I also think (when we anyway is talking election) that the election 
period should be at least 4 years, maybe 5, instead of only 3 years.
On th election year the partys mainly think of the election and work 
with election tactics, next year they can start to work a bit, and 
the year after that they begin to plan the stategy for next election.
With a longer period there would hopefully be many more things done 
between the elections.

(Slut på text 231 av Erik Lundevall)
(Kommentar i text 236 av K. Hansson-Renaud)
(Kommentar i text 238 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 243 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 232 - 

Text 232   1987-06-23 Klockan 11:34
Skrivet av: Michael Cronsten  #227
Kommentar till text 182 av Anders Kökeritz  #100
Ärende: The right mix

How about:
The Environmental Conservationalistic Party
or abbreviated E.C.P. (!)

(Slut på text 232 av Michael Cronsten)

Läsa (inlägg) 233 - 

Text 233   1987-06-23 Klockan 21:02
Skrivet av: Lars-Erik Svahn  #46
Kommentar till text 220 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Miljöpartiet/The green ones

Why must we get across what? And why just now?

(Slut på text 233 av Lars-Erik Svahn)
(Kommentar i text 244 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 234 - 

Text 234   1987-06-23 Klockan 21:05
Skrivet av: Lars-Erik Svahn  #46
Kommentar till text 221 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Miljöpartiet/The green ones

This is the original version (I WAS first!):


The ship is Earth.

The passengers are man and life.

The captain and his staff are the state.

The sea is the possibillity.

The rescue party are the wise.

The lifeboats are the spaceships.

The bar is the 'good life'.

The course is profitability.

The situation is grave danger.

The goal is will.

The visions are old.

The plans are to old.



(Slut på text 234 av Lars-Erik Svahn)

Läsa (inlägg) 235 - 

Text 235   1987-06-23 Klockan 22:09
Skrivet av: Lars-Erik Svahn  #46
Kommentar till text 222 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Miljöpartiet/The green ones

The rescue party doesn't care WHAT land is the nearest, because a 
wise man see further then his nose: sometimes you have to take one
step back, to take to steps forward.

When you are playing chess, and the best move is to move back the 
man you moved in the previouse move: do it!

(Slut på text 235 av Lars-Erik Svahn)
(Kommentar i text 245 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 236 - 

Text 236   1987-06-23 Klockan 22:19
Skrivet av: K. Hansson-Renaud  #161
Kommentar till text 231 av Erik Lundevall  #38
Ärende: 

4 years seems to be an ideal length of election period, I totally 
agree about that.

(Slut på text 236 av K. Hansson-Renaud)

Läsa (inlägg) 237 - 

Text 237   1987-06-23 Klockan 22:41
Skrivet av: Lars-Erik Svahn  #46
Kommentar till text 223 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Miljöpartiet/The green ones

You see!

They KNOW the ship is sinking. But instead of returning and admit 
a secondary missfailing - they go further and building new lifeboates
able to cross the sea with!

But this is SECRET! Of cause!

(Slut på text 237 av Lars-Erik Svahn)
(Kommentar i text 246 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 238 - 

Text 238   1987-06-24 Klockan 03:25
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 231 av Erik Lundevall  #38
Ärende: 

I see you think very much the same about MP and parliament as I do.

I'd guess many others ho are going to vote in 1988 are thinking along 
the same lines, and particulary younger voters.
Maybe younger persons are more flexible about political opinions, 
and therefor more easily accept this major change of parliament?

(Slut på text 238 av Harald Fragner)

Läsa (inlägg) 239 - 

Text 239   1987-06-25 Klockan 22:08
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 227 av K. Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: 

Yeah !! :)

(Slut på text 239 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 240 - 

Text 240   1987-06-25 Klockan 22:09
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 228 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Progress?

Well, actually, older person's lifelength is increasing too (that's 
also the reason why government health spending increases : More old 
people around these days.). But I recall LES (I believe) writing that 
HE did'nt want to live for ever.

(Slut på text 240 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 247 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 251 av Lars-Erik Svahn)

Läsa (inlägg) 241 - 

Text 241   1987-06-25 Klockan 22:12
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 229 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Miljöpartiet/The green ones

Well... Remember the parliament of 73 ? Both blocks got the same number 
of votes differing on a few thousands. And in 79 the margin wasn't 
too big.

(Slut på text 241 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 242 - 

Text 242   1987-06-25 Klockan 22:18
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 230 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: 

A famous swedish politician used to say : We have a mixed economy 
and we decide on the mixture ourselves.

(Slut på text 242 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 243 - 

Text 243   1987-06-25 Klockan 22:20
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 231 av Erik Lundevall  #38
Ärende: 

And separate election for Parliament, Regional and Local elections. 
(Although I think this problem is not present in Sthlm, I do believe 
this might be the case in other communities).

(Slut på text 243 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 248 av Erik Lundevall)

Läsa (inlägg) 244 - 

Text 244   1987-06-25 Klockan 22:22
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 233 av Lars-Erik Svahn  #46
Ärende: Miljöpartiet/The green ones

Cause on the shore we left poverty and plague rules, and on the one 
we're heading for wealth, health and peace rules.

(Slut på text 244 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 245 - 

Text 245   1987-06-25 Klockan 22:25
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 235 av Lars-Erik Svahn  #46
Ärende: Miljöpartiet/The green ones

And if the best move is to put guard on your piece, do it !

(Slut på text 245 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 246 - 

Text 246   1987-06-25 Klockan 22:27
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 237 av Lars-Erik Svahn  #46
Ärende: Miljöpartiet/The green ones

Well, I don't agree on that. I believe the ship is salvageable w/o 
returning to shore.

(Slut på text 246 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 247 - 

Text 247   1987-06-26 Klockan 03:30
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 240 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Progress?

Well, I certainly don't wish to go on living for ever.

If we'll be able to cure most of common diseases the government health 
spendings will grow immensely big. It's already increasing quite fast 
(as you say), and will certainly increase even more, caused by HIV 
and AIDS.

Let's assume someone finds out a way of keeping an HIV-infected person 
alive for say 20-30 years by giving him special treatment and medicines 
and new blod and so on. How much will it cost if AIDS is going to 
be what some say it will be (and has already started too)?

(Slut på text 247 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 249 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 248 - 

Text 248   1987-06-26 Klockan 08:07
Skrivet av: Erik Lundevall  #38
Kommentar till text 243 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: 

Yes, definitely. But I guess it while take quite a while before it 
will be reality.

(Slut på text 248 av Erik Lundevall)
(Kommentar i text 250 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 249 - 

Text 249   1987-06-26 Klockan 18:33
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 247 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Progress?

About HIV: It's a quite puzzling thought. If we solve the enigma of 
AIDS, I'd say we've probably (more or less) solved the problem of 
colds and cancer. All three relate to genetical changes inside living 
cells (though cancer does it in a slightly different way). Probably 
takes some time, though.

= = =

You don't want to live forever, you say. Ok, I can understand that 
(most people probably doesn't want to, I myself am not all too sure 
about the prospectives of eternal life, could be good, but might be 
real bad too.). But you don't want to just catch an unknown disease 
the other die and die in 2 or 3 weeks, do you ? Well, I'd guess not. 
And that's also quite normal, I do believe. Science and medecine does 
a lot of good things too (and it doesn't end here, evolution developes 
new plagues and we've got to keep paces).

Ars longa, vita brevis.
(Hippokrates, wasn't it?)

(Slut på text 249 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 252 av Lars-Erik Svahn)

Läsa (inlägg) 250 - 

Text 250   1987-06-26 Klockan 18:40
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 248 av Erik Lundevall  #38
Ärende: 

If there's a decision now, no more than 4 years. But, then there's 
no decision right now. Let's hope it comes soon (before the year 2001?).

(Slut på text 250 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 251 - 

Text 251   1987-06-26 Klockan 19:07
Skrivet av: Lars-Erik Svahn  #46
Kommentar till text 240 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Progress?

I certainly not want to live for ever! That is TO long...

(Slut på text 251 av Lars-Erik Svahn)

Läsa (inlägg) 252 - 

Text 252   1987-06-26 Klockan 21:49
Skrivet av: Lars-Erik Svahn  #46
Kommentar till text 249 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Progress?

There is something very wrong with medicin!

As you know, all sickness is very natural - it is a part of life, 
and some microorganisms are dangeous to some of us, but not to other.
Therefore travellers to foreign countries prepare themselfes before 
they go, with all kind of protections.

But, the reason that some of the microorganisms are dangerous is that 
we are not used to them! And medicin protect us from being used to 
them! We are building a tower - that some day will fall down...

And then - people wont be very used to the new situation...

(Slut på text 252 av Lars-Erik Svahn)
(Kommentar i text 255 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 253 - 

Text 253   1987-06-27 Klockan 02:09
Skrivet av: Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: Iran-Irak

Do you think that the Americans ore Soviets will get themselves
involved?

(Slut på text 253 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)
(Kommentar i text 254 av Erik Lundevall)
(Kommentar i text 256 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 254 - 

Text 254   1987-06-27 Klockan 12:30
Skrivet av: Erik Lundevall  #38
Kommentar till text 253 av Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: Iran-Irak

No I don't think so, they worry of course about the oil, but as long 
as there are other countries to get it from..
They probably ( at least the Soviet Union) like that the area is "destabili
"destabilized".

(Slut på text 254 av Erik Lundevall)

Läsa (inlägg) 255 - 

Text 255   1987-06-27 Klockan 14:45
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 252 av Lars-Erik Svahn  #46
Ärende: Progress?

Uhm. Should we give up travel, give up survival or start speeding 
up evolution ? No thanks. Technology IS part of our evolution, and 
if we handle it right it won't fall down (though some people show 
tendencies towards wanting to push humanity down while the tower yet 
hasn't risen to the stars...).

(Slut på text 255 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 256 - 

Text 256   1987-06-27 Klockan 14:48
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 253 av Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: Iran-Irak

They already are.

(Slut på text 256 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 257 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)
(Kommentar i text 259 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 261 av Erik Lundevall)

Läsa (inlägg) 257 - 

Text 257   1987-06-27 Klockan 16:42
Skrivet av: Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Kommentar till text 256 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Iran-Iraq

I mean will they declare war??

(Slut på text 257 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)
(Kommentar i text 258 av Mårten Brännström)

Läsa (inlägg) 258 - 

Text 258   1987-06-27 Klockan 17:18
Skrivet av: Mårten Brännström  #94
Kommentar till text 257 av Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: Iran-Iraq

Certanly not. To declare war is a far to old way to start war.
Nowadays they just start war without declarations.

I am warried "Iran - Iraq problem" in the area will make big
problems for us in a very soon future.

let 's see what is going to happen in that area.

(Slut på text 258 av Mårten Brännström)
(Kommentar i text 260 av Harald Fragner)

Läsa (inlägg) 259 - 

Text 259   1987-06-28 Klockan 03:48
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 256 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Iran-Irak

They are not in it OFFICIALLY, are they?
Otherwise the USSR and the USA could be said to be involved in practically 
everything....(which they, of course, are)

(Slut på text 259 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 264 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 260 - 

Text 260   1987-06-28 Klockan 03:51
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 258 av Mårten Brännström  #94
Ärende: Iran-Iraq

I rathet think they will continue to kill off each other, the same 
way as before, for say, the next five years or so.
Eventually, there won't be very many men laft to kill off though, 
so maybe it'll come to and end that way?

(Slut på text 260 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 265 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 261 - 

Text 261   1987-06-28 Klockan 10:43
Skrivet av: Erik Lundevall  #38
Kommentar till text 256 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Iran-Irak

Not as official paricipants as in Vietnam, Afghanistan und so weite.

(Slut på text 261 av Erik Lundevall)
(Kommentar i text 266 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 262 - 

Text 262   1987-06-28 Klockan 14:49
Skrivet av: J. Pettersson  #96
Ärende: According to nothing....

Isn't Irak spelled Iraq?
                      -

(Slut på text 262 av J. Pettersson)
(Kommentar i text 263 av Erik Lundevall)

Läsa (inlägg) 263 - 

Text 263   1987-06-28 Klockan 15:57
Skrivet av: Erik Lundevall  #38
Kommentar till text 262 av J. Pettersson  #96
Ärende: According to nothing....

Yes, of course it is, but who cares about a simple spelling mistake?

(Slut på text 263 av Erik Lundevall)
(Kommentar i text 267 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 264 - 

Text 264   1987-06-28 Klockan 20:20
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 259 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Iran-Irak

No, of course not. But then OFFICIALLY, Sweden are not exporting guns 
to Iran either.

(Slut på text 264 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 265 - 

Text 265   1987-06-28 Klockan 20:22
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 260 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Iran-Iraq

Well, they've already killed off half of all people between 12-25 
so they should have some trouble reproducing coming up.

(Slut på text 265 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 269 av Harald Fragner)

Läsa (inlägg) 266 - 

Text 266   1987-06-28 Klockan 20:24
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 261 av Erik Lundevall  #38
Ärende: Iran-Irak

Ceci est la discussion anglais, tu sais ?!
:-)

(Slut på text 266 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 268 av Erik Lundevall)
(Kommentar i text 274 av Michael Öhman)

Läsa (inlägg) 267 - 

Text 267   1987-06-28 Klockan 20:26
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 263 av Erik Lundevall  #38
Ärende: According to nothing....

Ayraique vs Ayron ...

(Slut på text 267 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 268 - 

Text 268   1987-06-29 Klockan 09:22
Skrivet av: Erik Lundevall  #38
Kommentar till text 266 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Iran-Irak

mozjet bit...

(Slut på text 268 av Erik Lundevall)

Läsa (inlägg) 269 - 

Text 269   1987-06-30 Klockan 00:24
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 265 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Iran-Iraq

They might rewrite the Koran a bit, sp that they can send out some 
of their younger women in the war too. But then, they won't be able 
to produce new young men. It seems that they've got trouble down there....

Neither of them does have a very large population, do they? I heard 
somewhere a while ago that they killed off som couple of thousands 
of people a day. So how soon can we expect them to run out of men?
Anyway, which country will get drained the first?

(Slut på text 269 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 270 av Erik Lundevall)

Läsa (inlägg) 270 - va

Du befinner dig i Speakers corner (engelska disk
Det finns inlägg från 100 till 291, du har 22 olästa inlägg.

Läsa (inlägg) 270 - 

Text 270   1987-06-30 Klockan 08:47
Skrivet av: Erik Lundevall  #38
Kommentar till text 269 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Iran-Iraq

There are 13 million in Iraq and 37 million in Iran (people of course...)
so Iraq has a bit less. On the other hand, in Iran they kill a lot 
of people even without any war...

(Slut på text 270 av Erik Lundevall)
(Kommentar i text 271 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 271 -

Text 271   1987-07-03 Klockan 21:03
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 270 av Erik Lundevall  #38
Ärende: Iran-Iraq

 And while in war Iran spends more people than Iraq does. Btw some 
 years ago I read that the reason for abolishing death by gun as a 
 punishment in Iran was the shortage of ammunition (nowadays most 
 people are hanged, it's probably the Irani governments way of 'bread 
 and theatre...').

(Slut på text 271 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 272 av Harald Fragner)

Läsa (inlägg) 272 -

Text 272   1987-07-04 Klockan 08:27
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 271 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Iran-Iraq

Then they must shoot/hang quite a lot of people?
Well, I suppose it isn't very hard to get oneself a death punishment 
in Iran. Stealing a loath of bread probably is quite enough, or wearing 
a bikini.....even if you happen to be a female....(-:

Probably it is some kind of 'bread and theatre' to the people. War 
always gets hard on everybody, so a hanging-party might even be relaxing.

(Slut på text 272 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 273 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 273 -

Text 273   1987-07-05 Klockan 00:35
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 272 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Iran-Iraq

Well, I suppose the people in Paris & al was quite excited about the 
guillotine ... for a start.

(Slut på text 273 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 274 -

Text 274 raderad.

Text 275   1987-07-06 Klockan 01:06
Skrivet av: Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Kommentar till text 274 av Michael Öhman  #188
Ärende: Iran-Irak

You aren't very good at French, are you?
Ils is plural so therfore it should be 'ils parlont' and not 'il parlent'.
By the way, isn't this an area for English dicussions and not French?

(Slut på text 275 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)
(Kommentar i text 276 av Michael Öhman)
(Kommentar i text 277 av Michael Öhman)

Läsa (inlägg) 276 -

Text 276 raderad.

Text 277   1987-07-06 Klockan 12:28
Skrivet av: Michael Öhman  #188
Kommentar till text 275 av Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: Iran-Irak

Damn IT !
It wasn't my intention to save the last message. What a hell
"Il parle Ils parlent" so i say to you my undear #161

Anatawa ao desu.

(Slut på text 277 av Michael Öhman)
(Kommentar i text 278 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)

Läsa (inlägg) 278 -

Text 278   1987-07-07 Klockan 00:37
Skrivet av: Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Kommentar till text 277 av Michael Öhman  #188
Ärende: Anatawa ao desu...

What the heck does that mean, and in what language?

(Slut på text 278 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)
(Kommentar i text 279 av Michael Öhman)

Läsa (inlägg) 279 -

Text 279 raderad.

Text 280   1987-07-07 Klockan 20:06
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 279 av Michael Öhman  #188
Ärende: Anatawa ao desu...

What language was THAT ?!

(Slut på text 280 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 281 -

Text 281   1987-07-07 Klockan 22:44
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Foreign languages

...I had to erase some texts......impossible to understand them....
.....surely they must have heared of the Queen's English...?
/MAD

(Slut på text 281 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 282 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)

Läsa (inlägg) 282 -

Text 282   1987-07-08 Klockan 00:25
Skrivet av: Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Kommentar till text 281 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Foreign languages

Queen's English was ist das?
(meine deutche ist 'terrible', I have never been taught German.)

(Slut på text 282 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)
(Kommentar i text 285 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 283 -

Text 283   1987-07-08 Klockan 11:57
Skrivet av: Michael Öhman  #188
Ärende: Russia...

Was it my text which you (MADnessguy) brutaly wiped out because you 
didn't understand them ?
This meeting is more like an artikel in PRAVDA. 

(Slut på text 283 av Michael Öhman)
(Kommentar i text 284 av Harald Fragner)

Läsa (inlägg) 284 -

Text 284   1987-07-08 Klockan 19:48
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 283 av Michael Öhman  #188
Ärende: Russia...

That's right. PRAVDA.

(Slut på text 284 av Harald Fragner)

Läsa (inlägg) 285 -

Text 285   1987-07-08 Klockan 20:05
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 282 av Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: Foreign languages

The Queen's English is the language supposed to been spoken at the 
royal court in London. It is, I suppose, some sort of standard, cf. 
BBC English and Oxford English.

(Slut på text 285 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 286 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 287 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 288 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)

Läsa (inlägg) 286 -

Text 286   1987-07-08 Klockan 20:07
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 285 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Foreign languages

'been' should have been 'be'. Sorry. (Shucks!)

(Slut på text 286 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 287 -

Text 287   1987-07-09 Klockan 00:52
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 285 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Foreign languages

Never heared of CT English?
That's what you get when you mix up all the faults and errors produced 
by some lunatics who are actually paying for the godblessed gift of 
getting their phonebills raised even more.
(-:

(Slut på text 287 av Harald Fragner)

Läsa (inlägg) 288 -

Text 288   1987-07-09 Klockan 13:24
Skrivet av: Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Kommentar till text 285 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Foreign languages

It was supposed to BE ironically, I forgot the 'ironiparantes'

(Slut på text 288 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)
(Kommentar i text 289 av Simon Tardell)

Läsa (inlägg) 289 -

Text 289   1987-07-09 Klockan 19:52
Skrivet av: Simon Tardell  #205
Kommentar till text 288 av Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Ärende: Foreign languages

I'm awfully SORRY. :)

(Slut på text 289 av Simon Tardell)
(Kommentar i text 290 av Harald Fragner)

Läsa (inlägg) 290 -

Text 290   1987-07-09 Klockan 22:53
Skrivet av: Harald Fragner  #201
Kommentar till text 289 av Simon Tardell  #205
Ärende: Foreign languages

So what do you mean by ':)'?

(Slut på text 290 av Harald Fragner)
(Kommentar i text 291 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)

Läsa (inlägg) 291 -

Text 291   1987-07-10 Klockan 00:15
Skrivet av: Krister Hansson-Renaud  #161
Kommentar till text 290 av Harald Fragner  #201
Ärende: Foreign languages

Maybe he has broken his nose:-)

(Slut på text 291 av Krister Hansson-Renaud)


-textslut-